Key Takeaways
- According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics data cited in press reports, September nonfarm payrolls rose just 29,000 against a consensus near 84,000, with prior months revised down a combined 60,000 and unemployment ticking up to 4.2%.
- Equity indices diverged, as the Nasdaq 100 ETF (QQQ) gained 0.68% for the week while the Dow Jones ETF (DIA) fell 1.24% and the S&P 500 ETF (SPY) slipped 0.22%.
- Technology was the strongest S&P 500 sector in the data at 1.82%, while healthcare (-2.67%) and financials (-2.48%) were the weakest.
- Precious metals retreated sharply, with the gold ETF (GLD) down 3.37% and the silver ETF (SLV) down 5.85%.
- Momentum and high-beta factor strategies led, while dividend-oriented and equal-weight strategies trailed.
Markets at a Glance
September 28 – October 2, 2026
1-week total return by segment, via ETF proxies, measured from the prior week’s final close (Sep 25, 2026) through the Oct 2, 2026 close. Bars share one scale across groups.
Equities
Bonds
Sectors
Alternatives
Factors
Weekly Recap
Returns were mixed across the major U.S. equity benchmarks for the week ending October 2, 2026. The S&P 500 ETF (SPY) edged down 0.22% and the Russell 1000 ETF (IWB) fell 0.27%, while the Nasdaq 100 ETF (QQQ) rose 0.68%. The Dow Jones ETF (DIA) was the laggard among the headline indices at -1.24%, and the small-cap Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) eased 0.17%.
International results skewed negative. The developed-markets ETF (EFA) declined 1.51% and the MSCI World ETF (URTH) fell 0.58%, while the emerging-markets ETF (EEM) slipped 0.43%. Beneath those averages, dispersion was wide, a theme that carried through sectors, countries, and asset classes this week.
What Moved Markets This Week
Labor-market data dominated the narrative. According to figures reported from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, September nonfarm payrolls came in at 29,000, well below a consensus near 84,000, with the two prior reports revised lower by a combined 60,000 and the unemployment rate rising to 4.2% against expectations for an unchanged 4.1%. As widely reported, stocks rose on Friday after the soft report, with markets appearing to price in a greater likelihood that the Federal Reserve would hold rates steady in October. Earlier in the week, the University of Michigan consumer sentiment reading was reported at 48.1, modestly ahead of a 47.8 consensus estimate.
Energy markets were unsettled by geopolitics. According to Bloomberg reporting, a standoff between the United States and Iran spurred oil-market volatility, with Brent crude noted near $105 amid concern about potential inflationary pressure. That backdrop coincided with a 1.47% gain in the energy sector ETF (XLE) for the week. In corporate news, TheStreet reported that Nvidia raised its share-buyback authorization by a record $150 billion, context that accompanied strength in the technology sector ETF (XLK), which led all sectors at 1.82%, and in the Nasdaq 100 ETF (QQQ).
Equities and Sectors
Sector performance was notably split. Alongside technology's 1.82% advance, the utilities ETF (XLU) gained 0.76% and energy rose 1.47%. On the other side, the healthcare ETF (XLV) fell 2.67%, the financials ETF (XLF) dropped 2.48%, and the communication services ETF (XLC) declined 2.36%. Real estate (XLRE), materials (XLB), and consumer staples (XLP) each lost more than 1.8%.
Country-level results spanned a very wide range. The Brazil ETF (EWZ) rose 3.75% and the South Korea ETF (EWY) gained 2.48%, with Taiwan (EWT) and Japan (EWJ) also higher. At the other end, the Mexico ETF (EWW) fell 4.87%, the India ETF (INDA) declined 2.8%, and the China ETF (MCHI) lost 2.62%. Over the trailing year, the same data shows even larger spreads, with the South Korea ETF (EWY) up 139.58% while the China ETF (MCHI) is down 21.19%, a reminder that short-term rankings can shift meaningfully over longer windows.
Fixed Income and Commodities
Bond returns were broadly negative as longer-dated prices fell. The U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG) declined 0.56%, the intermediate Treasury ETF (IEF) fell 0.71%, and the long-term Treasury ETF (TLT) dropped 1.63%. The short-term bond ETF (SHY) was a modest exception, adding 0.1%. Investment-grade corporates (LQD) fell 0.91% and high-yield bonds (HYG) declined 0.77%.
Precious metals were among the week's weakest areas. The gold ETF (GLD) fell 3.37% and the silver ETF (SLV) dropped 5.85%, trimming gains that remain positive over the trailing year for both, at 6.78% and 27.57% respectively.
Factors and Style
Factor strategies isolate a single characteristic of stocks. This week the growth-oriented and higher-risk characteristics led. The momentum ETF (MTUM), which tilts toward recent outperformers, rose 1.32%, and the high-beta ETF (SPHB), which emphasizes more volatile names, gained 1.14%. The quality ETF (QUAL) and growth ETF (VUG) posted small gains of 0.34% and 0.32%. In contrast, income-oriented approaches trailed: the dividend-growth ETF (SCHD) fell 1.54% and the high-dividend ETF (VYM) declined 0.81%. The value ETF (VLUE) slipped 0.72%, the equal-weight ETF (RSP) fell 0.65%, and the low-volatility ETF (USMV) edged down 0.17%.
The style box echoed that pattern. Growth outpaced value across capitalizations: the large-growth ETF (IWF) rose 0.63% while the large-value ETF (IWD) fell 1.02%, and the mid-growth ETF (IWP) led the box at 1.25% versus a 3.82% decline for mid-value (IWS). Notably, over the trailing year the data shows value still ahead, with the value factor ETF (VLUE) up 60.79% and the large-value ETF (IWD) up 24.21%, illustrating how weekly leadership can run counter to longer trends.
What This Means for Long-Term Investors
This week illustrated how uneven markets can be beneath a nearly flat headline: the S&P 500 ETF (SPY) moved just 0.22% while individual sectors ranged from technology's 1.82% gain to healthcare's 2.67% decline, country returns spanned from Brazil's 3.75% advance to Mexico's 4.87% drop, and precious metals and long Treasuries both fell as growth-oriented equities held up. For diversified, long-horizon investors, that dispersion is a practical reminder that leadership rotates across segments and that holding a mix of asset classes spreads exposure to outcomes no single week can predict.
Performance figures reflect ETF proxies for each market segment. Weekly returns are measured from the prior week’s final close (September 25, 2026) through the October 2, 2026 close; month and year figures are anchored to the same ending close. Dates reflect actual trading sessions, so market holidays can shift them.
This commentary is provided by Rubric Advisors, a California-registered investment adviser (registration does not imply a certain level of skill or training), for informational and educational purposes only. It does not constitute investment, legal, or tax advice, is not a recommendation or offer to buy or sell any security, and should not be relied upon as the sole basis for an investment decision. Market segment performance is measured using exchange-traded fund (ETF) proxies, which reflect fund expenses and may differ from their underlying indices; figures are unaudited and drawn from third-party data believed reliable but not guaranteed. Past performance does not guarantee future results. All investing involves risk, including possible loss of principal. Options strategies are not suitable for all investors, and private market investments are available only to qualified clients.